+- MFGG Forums (https://forums.mfgg.net)
+-- Forum: MFGG (https://forums.mfgg.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Suggestions (https://forums.mfgg.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+---- Forum: Resolved Suggestions (https://forums.mfgg.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+---- Thread: SOLVED Explain this QC. (Accepting Bad Fan-games.) (/showthread.php?tid=1052)
Explain this QC. (Accepting Bad Fan-games.) - OssieTheOstrich - 06-12-2018
How did THIS https://mfgg.net/index.php?act=resdb¶m=02&c=2&id=28092, GET ACCEPTED?
RE: Explain this QC. (Accepting Bad Fan-games.) - Pedigree - 06-12-2018
If it's playable and doesn't break any rules, then that would be why it was accepted. The goal of QC is to make sure games aren't rule breaking, aren't laced with viruses and that they run well enough, technically speaking, to play.
Honestly, is it really necessary to dig up a five year old game just to throw shade at staff for accepting it?
I'm pretty sure most of the QC staff has changed in five years and you're asking new staff why something was accepted when they weren't on staff to have been involved in the decision in the first place.
RE: Explain this QC. (Accepting Bad Fan-games.) - Mario - 06-12-2018
quality control is a misleading name, they're just submission approvers
RE: Explain this QC. (Accepting Bad Fan-games.) - HylianDev - 06-12-2018
Also that game was accepted over 5 years ago lol
RE: Explain this QC. (Accepting Bad Fan-games.) - Kaguya Houraisan - 06-12-2018
I just tried this. Gotta admit, even though it's pretty awfully made, I couldn't help laughing uncontrollably hard. It's such a crack, outside of gameplay, could be worth to make LP of it for fun.
RE: Explain this QC. (Accepting Bad Fan-games.) - VinnyVideo - 06-12-2018
Basically, what @Pedigree said. We do our best to apply the mainsite submission guidelines to each submission. We're not here to judge whether a game is good - that's the job of reviews and comments. We just make sure that games meet a basic set of standards.
I remember playing this game and thinking it's "so bad it's good." While it was roasted in the reviews (and it's not difficult to understand why), the general consensus was that it met the submission guidelines.