07-28-2019, 08:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-28-2019, 08:39 PM by Syaxamaphone.)
I just found the topics Mario was talking about.
Ye that's really dumb. Like whether or not you agree with Mario is w/e. Immediately closing the topic like that is a pain. How is anyone else going to weigh in? Like personally I had a hard time finding suggestions because it was smack dab in the middle of PPP and some other board I didn't care about. I liked the old spot.
Anyways that's not really important what's important is please don't close the topics until me specifically gets to post in them.
Just wanted to jump back in here and point out that this was added to the rules by Viti. Maybe on its own its not a terrible rule to have but I feel like in the context of these last few threads it would be used as an excuse to snuff out feedback in situations like this.
Best course of action or not, Mario made the second thread because the first one was locked without really letting the discussion he wanted to happen, happen.
I'm not trying to villainize anyone here I just think that this entire thing could be handled better. Mario is limited in the ways that he can effect MFGG so I think that it falls on staff to try and be more accommodating regarding requests and how they handle them.
Ye that's really dumb. Like whether or not you agree with Mario is w/e. Immediately closing the topic like that is a pain. How is anyone else going to weigh in? Like personally I had a hard time finding suggestions because it was smack dab in the middle of PPP and some other board I didn't care about. I liked the old spot.
Anyways that's not really important what's important is please don't close the topics until me specifically gets to post in them.
rules Wrote:Making duplicate threads in the "Suggestions" sub-forum is discouraged unless a significant amount of time (i.e. several months) has passed between the first thread and a new one or the new thread is only tangibly related to the subject matter of the original thread.
Just wanted to jump back in here and point out that this was added to the rules by Viti. Maybe on its own its not a terrible rule to have but I feel like in the context of these last few threads it would be used as an excuse to snuff out feedback in situations like this.
Best course of action or not, Mario made the second thread because the first one was locked without really letting the discussion he wanted to happen, happen.
I'm not trying to villainize anyone here I just think that this entire thing could be handled better. Mario is limited in the ways that he can effect MFGG so I think that it falls on staff to try and be more accommodating regarding requests and how they handle them.
![[Image: A1BH1oG.png]](http://i.imgur.com/A1BH1oG.png)
![[-]](https://forums.mfgg.net/images/emerald/collapse.png)