08-04-2019, 01:56 PM
(08-04-2019, 01:43 PM)Pedigree Wrote: Are the rare times that he pops up to give his opinion on banning a very specific member? Yes? Then calling him out on influencing decisions on this member isn't petty, it's addressing an issue that is STILL ONGOING even months after he left his admin post.He had no influence in Stir's ban.
(08-04-2019, 01:43 PM)Pedigree Wrote: Even if you don't think it matters who posts the rules for some reason???Oh there I meant it as in the same role would be posted either way, I do agree that we shouldn't let non-mods to do that stuff for several obvious reasons. Sorry for sounding like I was contradicting myself there.
(08-04-2019, 01:45 PM)Evil Yoshi Toes Wrote: Then they should do it in public like other members in my opinion. I don't feel right about having other staff dog-pile members in private and influence mod decision making, especially since the mods are the ones who get s*** when an unfair punishment is issued. Not trying to be rude to any of the other staff, I like them all a lot, but I think they should focus on their own roles and share their feedback on moderation publicly like everyone else. Advocating for a member to be banned is looked down upon when normal members do it, so why is it different for non-mod staff? They all have their roles and they are very important and I'm very grateful for what they do for the community, but banning members isn't part of their jobs.I completely agree with this.