08-05-2019, 01:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-05-2019, 01:55 PM by The Dark Warrior.)
nothing is ever isolated. if you want to make a case that stir deserves to banned for over a year, don't use the sig as the straw that broke the camel's back. it should be on all the posts he made that genuinely did violate the rules on that. why it came off as harsh to people is bc we are looking at it on what he did with this latest act which yes, a year ban is disproportionate. why hasn't anyone openly cited examples of his acts that he did prior to this latest incident that may give context to why he deserves to be banned for such a long time. even I think as it stands, the way this discourse has been going on, it is what makes me want to side with the people who said it was too harsh.
edit - sorry I didn't see the above poster post before me, I just submitted then it was updated.
edit - sorry I didn't see the above poster post before me, I just submitted then it was updated.